Wire Fox Terrier
10 Wire Fox Terriers in the atlas. Every number on this page has a source.
10 Wire Fox Terriers in the Sniff Atlas. Population-genetic snapshot, Mendelian carrier frequencies from Donner 2023, and the data substrate's release version, sample sizes, and evidence tier on every claim.
In the atlas, the Wire Fox Terrier clusters consistently as Wire Fox Terrier (100% of the 10 dogs here). At the trait loci, STC2 runs lower than average (0% here vs 74%); MSRB3 runs lower than average (15% here vs 80%). Dogs here sit in a relatively sparse region of the atlas, fewer close neighbors than typical.
High breed predictability score (13.76), individual dogs of this breed reliably cluster together genetically. Only 10 dogs of this breed in the atlas, modestly sampled.
Closest genetic neighbors in the atlas: village dog Nz Mid, Retriever Breed Unknown, Norwegian Elkhound, village dog Slovakia, and village dog Slavic.
What the genome says about Wire Fox Terrier
Computed from the 18,477 research dogs in the Atlas.
- Village Dog Nz Mid13.02
- Retriever Breed Unknown19.88
- Norwegian Elkhound20.68
- Village Dog Slovakia20.94
- Village Dog Slavic21.44
Frequency of the alternate allele in this breed at each locus's representative SNP.
| IGF1 | 15% |
| HMGA2 | 0% |
| SMAD2 | 95% |
| LCORL | 100% |
| STC2 | 0% |
| ADAMTS17 | 15% |
| FGF4·CFA18 | 100% |
| FGF4·CFA12 | 100% |
| RSPO2 | 0% |
| FGF5 | 80% |
| KRT71 | 80% |
| MC1R | 95% |
| MSRB3 | 15% |
| BMP3 | 5% |
| SMOC2 | 85% |
What does the genome say about how a Wire Fox Terrier looks?
Wire Fox Terriers look the way they do because of a small set of fixed and near-fixed morphology genes that, taken together, define the visible breed. Each translation below pairs the gene with the trait an owner actually sees, the breed's allele frequency at that locus, and a one-clause causal phrase.
Size and build
IGF1 is at 15% for the small-body allele, leaving the breed firmly in the larger end of the dog body-size spectrum.
HMGA2 is at 0%, leaving most of the size signal to other loci in the panel.
SMAD2 is near-fixed at 95%, a chromosome-7 height locus differentiating small from giant breeds.
LCORL is near-fixed at 100%, the NCAPG/LCORL height locus that is one of the strongest single contributors to canine body size.
STC2 is at 0%, leaving the growth-axis signal to other loci.
ADAMTS17 is at 15%, the lower-frequency allele in this breed.
Leg length
The FGF4 retrogene on chromosome 18 is near-fixed in this breed at 100%. This is the leg-length variant. The breed is fully committed to the long-legged form rather than the short-legged Corgi-and-Dachshund body plan.
The FGF4 retrogene on chromosome 12 is near-fixed at 100%, the chondrodystrophic variant associated with intervertebral disc disease risk in breeds that carry it.
Coat type, length, and color
RSPO2 is at 0% for the furnishings allele. The breed does not carry the eyebrows-and-mustache pattern of Wheatens, Schnauzers, or wire-haired terriers.
FGF5 sits at 80% for the long-coat variant. Coat length is influenced by other loci as well, so intermediate FGF5 frequencies do not always correspond to intermediate visible coat lengths.
KRT71 sits at 80% for the wavy/curly variant. Coat curl varies across individuals at this intermediate frequency, and visible expression is also influenced by modifier loci.
MC1R is at 95% at the representative SNP. MC1R controls the switch between red-to-gold and black-to-brown pigment, with the e/e homozygous genotype producing the gold-to-red spectrum by blocking eumelanin (black and brown pigment).
Ears
MSRB3 is at 15% for the drop-ear allele, keeping the breed's ears upright and prick.
Skull shape
BMP3 is at 5%, keeping the breed in the dolichocephalic, long-headed form.
SMOC2 is at 85%, the major locus contributing to the breed's brachycephalic face shape.
Where every number on this page came from.
This page draws on three primary data sources. Carrier frequencies for the Mendelian section come from Donner et al. 2023 (CC-BY-4.0). We grade these data at evidence Limited because the cohort is a direct-to-consumer ascertainment, which biases toward owners who chose to test their dogs. The panel also uses tag-SNP proxies for some variants rather than direct causal-variant assays. Limited is a study-design grade, not a quality grade: the Donner cohort is the largest open canine-genotype dataset in existence and we are grateful for it. We rate the confounding MEDIUM.
Population-genetic dimensions (heterozygosity, intra-breed PCA distance, nearest neighbors, trait-locus frequencies) come from CanVAS (Brundage 2026), harmonized through the Sniff Atlas. The exact release date and verification commit are pinned at the bottom of the page so a researcher can trace a number back to a specific snapshot. The disease-gene-variant graph comes from OMIA (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals; Nicholas, Tammen, and the Sydney Informatics Hub at the Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney; retrieved April 2026, DOI 10.25910/2AMR-PV70).
What this page does not yet have. Inheritance modes and per-disease penetrance evidence from Donner 2023 are now in the structured data for every variant the panel covers. Mondo, OMIM, Ensembl, and HGNC cross-references on gene pages remain pending — they arrive in December 2026 alongside the imputed 9.67M-variant CanVAS dataset via the OMIA SQL dump absorption. Until then, gene IDs carry NCBI Gene and OMIA phene URLs only; the wider human-homolog and disease-ontology cross-reference set fills in with that release.
How to cite this page. The computed dimensions on this page are derived from the open Sniff Atlas v1.0.1 (Gehring 2026, doi:10.5281/zenodo.20566358, CC-BY 4.0). Full citation formats including BibTeX, RIS, and CITATION.cff at sniff.world/cite.
We have 10 wire fox terriers. We do not have yours.
Every wire fox terrier added sharpens the breed's genetic neighborhood. Enrollment is free. The data stays open. The star is permanent.
- Donner J, Anderson H, Davison S, et al. (2023). Frequency and distribution of 152 genetic disease variants in over 1,000,000 mixed-breed and purebred dogs. PLOS Genetics 19(2):e1010651. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1010651
- Brundage J, et al. (2026). CanVAS: a harmonized canine variant atlas. bioRxiv. doi:10.64898/2026.04.13.718238
- Nicholas, F.W., Tammen, I., & Sydney Informatics Hub. (2026). Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals (OMIA) [dataset]. The University of Sydney. https://omia.org. doi:10.25910/2AMR-PV70 (retrieved April 2026).